Difference between revisions of "New York City Hackers"

Revision as of 17:47, 18 January 2015

New York City Hackers

New York City Hackers Title Card
Format	Video (Web?)
Genre	Documentary
Origin	USA
Language	English
Release Date	1 December 2000
Running Time	30 min
Production
Created by	Stig-Lennart Sorensen
Directed by	Stig-Lennart Sorensen
Produced by	Stig-Lennart Sorensen
Written by	Stig-Lennart Sorensen
Screenplay by	NA
Distributed by	Stig-Lennart Sorensen
Narrated by	NA
Starring	Jon Johansen, Alan Kotok, mr. ohm, Robin Gross, Cheshire Catalyst, Eugene Kaspureff, Emmanuel Goldstein, spudz, Andy Miller, Mike Hudack, John Mcnamara
Music by	NA
Cinematography by	Stig-Lennart Sorensen
Edited by	Stig-Lennart Sorensen
Production Company	NA
Location(s)	Various
Original Channel	NA
Additional Information
Based on	NA
Topics	Technology, Computers, Hacking
Follows	NA
Precedes	NA
Associated Video	NA
Website	NA

New York City Hackers is an independent documentary by Stig-Lennart Sorensen released in the year 2000. Most of the filming occurs in in New York at the H2K conference, 2600 meeting and an Off the Hook radio show. There is also a coverage of the original MIT hackers from the TMRC club.

Synopsis

New York City Hackers is an independent documentary by Stig-Lennart Sorensen released in the year 2000. Most of the filming occurs in in New York at the H2K conference, 2600 meeting and an Off the Hook radio show. There is also a coverage of the original MIT hackers from the TMRC club.

The documentary explores the hacker culture by distinguishing computer hackers from common criminals. In the very beginning the viewer is presented with a segment from Off the Hook radio show where Emmanuel Goldstein, the show's host, uses Kevin Mitnick as an example of a hacker distinct from people perpetrating destructive denial of service (DoS) attacks against websites. Not everybody with access to tools and resources to pull off a successful DoS attack is a hacker, Emmanuel observes. Cheshire Catalyst describes hacking as a process of hacking away at a keyboard until computer does what you want it to do. He also contrasts true hackers with sensationalized “14 year olds twerps who crack into computers” also described as crackers.

In order to track down the historical meaning of the word hacker, NYC hackers moves to MIT's Tech Model Railroad Club or TMRC. TMRC attracted a lot of electrical engineering hackers in the 1960s who liked solving logic problems presented by the electro-mechanical train control system at the club. Alan Kotok, one of the original MIT hackers, describes how he slowly progressed to hacking on a TX-0 and the telephone system. Alan recognizes the grand temptation of hackers to demonstrate their full mastery of a system by getting it to do things that it wasn't intended to do.

At a monthly 2600 meeting, Mike Hudack, a chief scientists at a security company, notes that meeting's attendees are mostly made up of people who wish to be hackers rather than actual hackers. The reason for this is simply the fear for actual hackers to appear at such public meetings due to crackdowns by law enforcement agencies which tend to assume computer hackers as guilty before proven otherwise.

The last two segments of the documentary describe two significant political and legal issues that hackers are involved in. As Cheshire Catalyst describes it, hackers would much rather spend their time dealing with technical challenges. However, because politics is invading the technology, hackers are becoming more involved in politics to voice their opinions. The first example of hackers getting entangled in politics is the legal action that MPAA took against 2600 magazine after the latter mirrored DeCSS code, a program used to break DVD protection mechanism. The second example of hackers getting politically involved is the issue of government controlled Internet. According to Eugene Kashpureff, the US government controls IP address allocation, domain name space and governs how the Tier 1 Internet providers can do their business. All of these control mechanisms effectively translates to a complete government control which impedes people's basic rights of freedom of speech and freedom of privacy.

Downloads

References

• thesprawl.org

External Links